‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and other misunderstandings of privacy

 IDENTITY


Daniel J. Solove


George Washington University Law School

San Diego Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 745, 2007

GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 289

Abstract:

 In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: “I’ve got nothing to hide.” According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.

Keywords: privacy, nothing to hide, data mining, surveillance

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Reference: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565&rec=1&srcabs=416740&alg=1&pos=5

Related

Identity-theft privacy and the architecture of vulnerability

 

Advertisements

~ by mindcontrolinsweden on February 7, 2015.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: