Research fraud: methods for dealing with an issue that negatively impacts society‘s view of science

manniskokroppen

by Dr. Dov Greenbaum

10 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 61 (2009) (Published May 15, 2009)

Abstract

Like the legal and medical professions, the relatively insular academic scientific community has always preferred to deal with instances of misconduct quietly, without external intervention. Recent highly publicized instances of scientific misconduct have shocked the community, renewing calls for alternative approaches to address this growing threat to science’s position of trust within society, and consequently the public’s generous funding of academic research. Science‘s inability to effectively define the outer boundaries of misconduct, coupled with a lack of ethics education and enforcement, has led to the current situation. This article examines the current level of fraud and enforcement and suggests some policy alternatives to the status quo.

This article first presents a novel tiered structure based on a simple analysis of two basic components of any instance of scientific misconduct, to provide a method to discriminate between different levels of misconduct. Next, this article looks to a number of authorities and institutions that could educate current and future scientists about the nature and effects of fraud in scientific research. Finally, this article explores options for enforcing and punishing instances of misconduct, including both civil and criminal, particularly mindful of the devastating career implications resulting from any association with an investigation of misconduct. In this vein, First Amendment and due process issues are highlighted and examined. This article concludes that, given the devastating repercussions to even exonerated scientists, a criminal code that takes into account the particular concerns of the scientific community would best provide protection for scientists and promote a more ethical scientific community.

SAIP

Reference: http://stlr.org/archived-volumes/volume-x-2008-2009/greenbaum/

Related

STOP EU’s The Human Brain Project

Obama is paying MIT, DARPA and Rockefeller for human brain experiments

Citizens War Crimes Tribunal to procecute transhumanist agenda

Transhumanist Declaration

Anders Sandberg om Artificiell Intelligence (AI) och mänsklighetens framtid

Computational Biochemistry

Advertisements

~ by mindcontrolinsweden on December 17, 2014.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: